Post match I like to read as much as I can before posting up a blog to gauge the feeling after a win or a loss. Post Bayern it was easy to get lost in the jubilation of the win, if you can’t feel great after winning a scalp like that you’re never going to enjoy football. It’s somewhat of a fan flaw to overlook the moments when Bayern cut through but couldn’t finish and enjoy the points where we scored.
How differently would we have felt if in injury time when Lewandowski got by Koscielny for the first time the whole game and instead of whatever divine intervention seemed to occur at that point he had chosen to smash it into the roof of the net. The fan reaction certainly wouldn’t have been that jubilant and we’d be out completely of the Champions league.
Similarly there were moments in this Everton match when things could have been squared up. One particular moment was when Lukaku managed to screw a free header onto the post (thank god).
It could be a trick my mind goes through when watching games like this, I seem to put in place a logic that I think the flow of the game will pursue. This match it was as such:
- Bayern made us run a lot but we won that mid-week foray so the Arsenal players will want to come out and feel they can thrash Everton
- We will probably score in the opening moments of each half because of this but as the half wares on our legs will tire and Everton will likely get on-top
- We’re probably not going to score in the last half of each half
Thankfully I was wrong. A sublime Ozil ball into Giroud allowed him to score late in the first half. What then followed was an excellent Giroud tackle followed by Sanchez winning the free kick which Koscielney then converted. Those were two goals created by sublime passes that are only made by players who are in form.
Thanking the football gods I thought I could relax and enjoy the second half. Then a lucky deflection saw Cech beaten from a Barkley outside the box-deflected off defender and into the net classic special that Everton seem to score every second game. The stats show that outside box shots are scored 2% of the time but for Everton they seem to make up about 90% of their highlight reels.
Into the second half we came out refreshed and had an excellent opening period. For me there was this niggling feeling that we were playing to the way that Everton were set-up. In the 70th minute Wenger brought on Flamini to shore things up. Only Wenger and Flamini know why he was running about in the oppositions box trying to score and not helping Coquelin out in central midfield. His foray into the box was the moment the game hinged. It was Everton’s turn for a Bayern-esque moment akin to the Lewandowski divine miss moment that allowed us to get forward and score.
Praise be to Petr Cech who managed to scramble the ball away to be cleared after the ensuing counter-charge.
For me I don’t know how I feel about this win. Is this just what it’s like to have a world class keeper who week after week seems to make the sublime save that decides the match. Chelsea had him for years and every game there would be one moment that Theo or van Persie or Giroud would get through for a one-on-one that he would stop. De Gea last year to my mind is the only reason why United ended up in the top four. They had spent a lot of money that transfer window but they scraped out a tonne of 1-0 results that kept them in it thanks to his keeping. Never forget the Fellaini long ball special was their number 1 strike option for a lot of last season.
We had chances to kill this game. In the second half we did hit the bar through Giroud and Ozil and Howard had a moment where we ended up missing an open net. Where the matter of debate lies is whether we were killing it in the right way. Had Flamini come on and instead of trying to score just sat back and won the ball we may have been allowed to pass the legs out of Everton. This may have resulted in the win in a slower but less heart attack inducing manner.
I’m writing like this because even though I do hate criticising a win I believe that People like Mark King (@mzk90) make an interesting case that should be debated.
Poor 2nd half, (roll out the excuses) Wenger going mad in TA but doing little about it. No Theo to push them back?
— Mark King (@mzk90) October 24, 2015
His argument is that the space Theo opens up would have killed the game and that Wenger not bringing on Theo and making defensive changes was not helping the result. But people have a tendency to jump onto criticism saying things like this:
@mzk90 ffs we won the game
— Joga Bonito (@fighting_gooner) October 24, 2015
ffs indeed. We did win but a balance needs to be struck and I would be interested in hearing why Wenger was going mad in the TA. Was he screaming at the Flame “Jesus christ I told you to stand next to Coquelin and do your god damn job”. Tactically he may have made the defensive decision and Flamini could have executed it incorrectly, certainly the introduction of Gibbs says as much.
But there’s never just one right answer and one of the excellent things about football is we can debate opinions. It’s a fact that we won this game and it’s also a fact that there are many different ways to win a match of football. Cultural identity can become entwined with a playing style which is the only real logic I’ve ever heard for playing one way over the other (in other words a football philosophy). You can win both ways.
Pragmatists argue against romantics in this regard calling for decisions that sure up a match and lambast Wenger when he doesn’t make a defensive change. That said it is the thought that informs an argument that defines it as pragmatic or romantic.
A romantic argument would be we could have brought Theo on to score and kill the game is a offensive decision. Scoring occurring makes the decision absolutely correct. A pragmatic argument for the same decision reads: we could have brought Theo on to push back the Everton back-line opening up space for us to play a possession game which is a defensive decision. Had this occurred it would be absolutely correct. One thing could have happened which would have made both arguments satisfied.
My opinion is that as Everton were already losing they may have thrown caution to the win and just let Theo go in behind at which point if we couldn’t win the ball back it is just as likely they would have scored from a set piece as us scoring from a break away which is why Giroud was left on. If you view football through the probability prism what’s the difference in likelihood that Everton would have scored from a set piece and Theo would have scored on the break. Statistics and all that but there’s no way we can really settle the argument.
That’s because our expectations of what the way the game was going to play out largely determines how we feel about a win. To my logic shown above going into this match we could have won 3-0 by the first quarter of the first half. I’m a bit deluded like that. In fact my expectations were flipped on their head. Not a bad thing at all but it something that opens was open for discussing pre-game and now how we won is open for discussing post. Ffs Mark King we did win but ffs we could have won another way and ffs I’ll be damned if I don’t enjoy a good pub-session discussing our version of fantasy football after a game.
As long as we keep an eye on what really matters is that we won. That’s the fact. The rest is just opinions and a bit of fun.
Til next time.